Tuesday, November 18, 2014

WW2 Invasion of France

By May 1940, Europe had been at war for nine months. Yet Britain and France, despite having declared war on Germany in September 1939 following Hitler’s attack on Poland, had seen little real fighting. This tense period of anticipation – which came to be known as the ‘Phoney War’ – met an abrupt end on 10 May 1940, when Germany launched an invasion of France and the Low Countries.


The German plan of attack, codenamed Case Yellow, entailed an armoured offensive through the Ardennes Forest, which bypassed the strong French frontier defences of the Maginot Line. The advance would then threaten to encircle French and British divisions to the north, stationed on the Belgian frontier.

The German offensive quickly overwhelmed Dutch forces, and the bombing of Rotterdam persuaded the Netherlands to surrender on 15 May. And although German forces in the north encountered strong French and Belgian resistance, the main German thrust through the Ardennes met with tremendous success. French second-rate divisions in the area were not prepared or equipped to deal with the major armoured thrust that developed (the forest and poor roads were thought to make this impossible), and were hammered by incessant attacks by German bombers.



Just four days into the invasion German troops crossed the Meuse river, and had broken through the French lines. Attempts by the Allies to launch counterattacks by air and land either failed with heavy losses, or were thwarted by the pace of events. The British Expeditionary Force, along with the best units of the French army, were still in the north and had seen little fighting. But the German breakthrough to the south now forced them into rapid retreat to avoid being cut off with their backs to the sea. On 20 May German tanks reached Amiens and effectively trapped the British, who now made for Dunkirk and an unlikely attempt at evacuation to England.


In these desperate circumstances, an evacuation plan known as ‘Operation Dynamo’ was hastily prepared in Dover by Vice Admiral Bertram Ramsay. His strategy included an appeal for all civilian vessels that could cross the Channel to help ferry the troops from the beaches to larger ships offshore, or to evacuate them entirely. Between 26 May and 4 June - a period during which Hitler halted the advance of his troops on Dunkirk - 200,000 British and 140,000 French troops were evacuated to England. Nine allied destroyers and approximately 200 civilian vessels were lost during the evacuation, and the RAF suffered severe casualties covering the operation from the air.


On 5 June, the Germans swung southwards and French resistance finally collapsed, although not without heavy fighting. On 10 June, Italy opportunistically entered the war on Germany’s side. Four days later, the French capital fell, provoking the flight of the French Government to Bordeaux. The Government capitulated on 25 June, just seven weeks after the beginning of the invasion.



The British 51st Highland Division - stationed in the Maginot Line when the fighting started – was forced to surrender at St Valéry. During the final evacuation of British troops from St Nazaire on the Atlantic coast, the troopship Lancastria was sunk with the loss of around 4,000 refugees, British troops and crew.



Reluctant to take the risk that the French Navy would end up under German control, Churchill ordered the Royal Navy to present French warships at Mers-el-Kebir with an ultimatum to sail to Britain or to a neutral port for internment. When this offer was rejected on 3 July, British ships bombarded the fleet, killing 1,600 people. Although this operation did much to assure America of the strength of the British purpose, it and the evacuation of Dunkirk did immeasurable damage to Franco-British wartime relations.

Monday, November 17, 2014

WW2 era German half-tracks

There were four main model modifications (Ausführung A through D), which formed the basis for at least 22 variants. The initial idea was for a vehicle that could be used to transport a single squad of panzer-grenadiers to the battlefield protected from enemy small arms fire, and with some protection from artillery fire. In addition, the standard mounting of at least one MG 34 or MG 42 machine gun allowed the vehicle to provide support by fire for the infantry squad once they had disembarked in battle.


Positive aspects of the open top included greater situational awareness and faster egress by the infantry, as well as the ability to throw grenades and fire over the top of the fighting compartment as necessary while remaining under good horizontal cover. The downside was a major vulnerability to all types of plunging fire; this included indirect fire from mortars and field artillery, as well as depressed-trajectory small arms fire from higher elevated positions, lobbed hand grenades, even Molotov's cocktails, and strafing by enemy aircraft.


The first two models were produced in small numbers from 1939. A and B models can be identified by the structure of the nose armor, which comprised two trapezoidal armor panels - the lower of which had a cooling hatch. The B model, which began production in 1940, eliminated the fighting compartment's side vision slits.



The C model, which started production in mid-1940, featured a simplified hexagonal-shaped forward armored plate for the engine. Models A through C had rear doors that bulged out. The C model had a large production run, but was quite complex to build, involving many angled plates that gave reasonable protection from small arms fire. From early 1943, the D model was developed with the purpose of halving the number of angled body plates, simplifying the design and thus speeding up the production. D models can be easily recognized by their single piece sloping rear (with flat doors).



The standard personnel carrier version was equipped with a 7.92 mm MG 34 or MG 42 machine gun mounted at the front of the open compartment, above and behind the driver. A second machine gun could be mounted at the rear on an anti-aircraft mount.

Variants were produced for specialized purposes, including with anti-aircraft guns, light howitzers, anti-tank guns and mortars or even large unguided artillery rockets, as well as a version with an infrared search light used to spot potential targets for associated Panther tanks equipped with infrared detectors.

Another potentially good design feature of the Sd.Kfz.251 was the large track area, with the characteristic "slack track" design with no return rollers for the upper run of track, and the Schachtellaufwerk system of overlapping and interleaved main road wheels common to virtually all German halftracks of the period.


This lowered the ground pressure and provided better traction, giving the Sd.Kfz.251 better cross country performance than most other nations' half-tracked vehicles. However, the interleaved and overlapping main road wheels shared a major problem with the Tiger I and Panther main battle tanks that also used such road wheel configurations - in muddy or winter weather conditions, such as those during a rasputitsa mud season or the coldest Russian winter conditions, accumulated mud and snow could freeze solid between the road wheels, immobilizing the vehicle.


 



Tuesday, October 28, 2014

German King Tiger Tank



The German King Tiger Tank was introduced in early 1944 and was the most powerful tank during world war 2. With its powerful 88mm gun and an almost impenetrable front armor, it was one of the most feared weapons of world war 2. Up to the end of the war, the allies had not introduce any effective means to counter the threat.

German heavy tank development began as early as 1937 with the German Armaments Ministry issuing a specification for a new heavy tank to Daimler-Benz, Henschel, MAN and Porsche. The project however was ignored as the Panzer III and IV had so far proved effective tanks and served well  in combat. It was not until spring 1941 that the project was revived after Hitler was impressed with heavy allied tanks, such as the French Char B1 and British Matilda 1 during the campaign in the west.


At a meeting with Hitler on 26th May, 1941, the planning for the development of a new heavy tank begun. During that meeting, Hitler ordered for the creation of heavy Panzers which were to have an increased effectiveness to penetrate enemy tanks; possess heavier armor than was previously achieved; and attain a maximum speed of at least 40km/h. These key decisions led to the development of a new heavy tank, the Tiger 1 tank and ultimately the King Tiger. However, no clearly defined objectives or action plans were laid out for the succession of the Tiger 1 tank until January 1943 when the order was given for a new design which was to replace the existing Tiger 1.


Although the designation implies that the Tiger II is a succession of the Tiger 1, it is in effect a completely different tank. The first design consideration for the new tank was the selection of a more effective main gun. As with the Tiger tank, it was to mount an 88mm anti tank gun but the main gun on the Tiger II was far more powerful than that on the Tiger 1. For the development of the chassis, two firms were contracted to come up with the designs namely Henschel and Sohn of Kassel and Porsche of Stuttgart. Both firms Henschel and Porsche were responsible for only the chassis and automotive designs. Turret design was awarded to another firm Krupp of Essen.

The main gun specification of the King Tiger was to be a variation of the 88mm anti-aircraft gun. Although the 88mm was initially designed for an anti aircraft role, it proved to be an excellent tank killer. Originally, the intention was to mount an 88mm Flak 41 into a turret for the Porsche VK4501 (P) chassis. The turret had been originally designed by Krupp to hold the 56 caliber 88mm KwK 36 gun of the Tiger 1. After much experimentation and debate, it was decided in early 1943 that it was not possible to mount the 88mm Flak 41. Krupp had then been contracted to design a new turret that could mount their own version of a 71 caliber 88mm Kwk 43 gun that could fit in both the chassis for Henschel and Porsche.

The 88mm gun with the designation KwK 36 and KwK 43 indicated the model number year 36 and 43. The Tiger II with the model 43 has a length of 71 calibers (71 times 88mm) as compared with 56 calibers of the Tiger 1 with model 36. The length of the barrel itself is over 20 feet long while the rounds weighed almost 20kgs. It is in effect a much more powerful gun than the Tiger 1.

The King Tiger’s 88mm main gun has a muzzle velocity of 1000m per second when firing armor piercing rounds. It was highly accurate and able to penetrate 150mm of armor at distances exceeding 2200m. Since the flight time of an armor piercing round at a range of 2200m is about 2.2 seconds or less, accuracy and correction of fire against moving targets is more important than with older anti tank guns. This made this heavy predator ideally suited to open terrain where it could engage enemy tanks at long range before the opponent’s weapons were even in range.

For the chassis, much has been learnt from the sloped armor design of the Russian T-34. As with the Panther, the King Tiger was to have sloped and interlocked front and side armor. The front armor was 150mm thick and the side was 80mm thick. Both firms Henschel and Porsche submitted their own designs.

Porsche designed the VK4502 (P) chassis which was built on the previous VK4501 (P) design of the Tiger 1. The codename VK was for Volkettenfahrzeuge or "fully tracked experimental vehicle", 45 means a 45 ton class and 01 represents the first model. The VK4502 (P) chassis had a similar outlook with the Tiger 1, sharing many similarities such as the suspension and automotive parts. Two designs were submitted, the first one having its turret mounted centrally and the second had the turret mounted towards the rear with the engine in front. However, it used copper for the electric transmission which Germany was in shortage of. This design was rejected and did not enter production.

Henschel designed the VK4503 (H) chassis which was very similar in appearance to the Panther. The front armor was 150mm thick and sloped at an angle of 50 degrees. The side was 80mm thick sloped at 25 degrees. As with all German tanks at that time, it had a ball mounted MG34 fitted on the right front side of the hull. The suspension consisted of torsion bars with nine sets of overlapping steel rimmed wheels on each side. The tracks were 2 feet 8 1/2 inches wide, weighing 2.5 tons. Henschel’s design was accepted and destined to enter mass production.

Krupp had designed the turrets to fit both the Porsche and Henschel chassis. The initial design called P-2 Turm (or commonly known as Porsche turret) mounted a single piece (monobloc) barrel of the 88mm and had a curved mantlet in the front. The front armor was 100 mm thick, the sides were 88mm thick sloped at 60 degrees and the top armor was 40mm thick. It had space to carry 16 rounds of ammunition in the turret. However, the curved mantlet in the front acted as a shot trap by deflecting incoming shots downwards towards the roof of the hull. A new design was ordered to fix this but as an interim measure, it was decided to go ahead with the production of 50 units with this turret. This was commonly referred to as Porsche turret. The new design called Serien Turm, or commonly known as Henschel or Production turret was to retain the many features of the Porsche turret and was to be adopted for mass production. Henschel turret had the front curved mantlet replaced with one 180mm thick armor plate sloped at 81 degrees. The sides were altered to slope at 69 degrees and it could carry an additional 6 six rounds or 22 rounds of ammunition in the turret. The full combat weight was 68,500kg when fitted with the Porsche turret and 69,800kg with the Henschel turret.


Sunday, October 12, 2014

8.8cm Raketenwerfer 43 - Anti-Tank Rocket Launcher


WW2 - Nazi Torrent Collection Links;


It was given to infantry to bolster their anti-tank capability. The weapon was fired from a small two-wheeled gun carriage which fired a rocket-propelled, fin-stabilized grenade with a shaped charge warhead, similar to the grenade of the Panzerschreck but not the same. Approximately 3,000 units were completed from 1943 to 1945. It was made in much smaller numbers than either the Panzerschreck, which was based on the American Bazooka, or the Panzerfaust, which was a disposable recoilless rifle firing an anti-tank grenade. This is partly because it was realized that a simple hollow tube with an ignition device was all that was needed to launch the 88 mm rocket, rather than an elaborate miniature artillery piece with carriage and breech. Due to the carriage and better sights, the accuracy was better, and the range more than double that of the Panzerschreck




Specifications for the
8.8cm Raketenwerfer 43 (Puppchen)
Anti-Tank Rocket Launcher

Country of Origin: Nazi Germany
Manufacturer: State Arsenals - Nazi Germany
Initial Year of Service: 1943

Overall Length: 2972 mm (117.01 in)
Barrel Length: 1,486.00 mm (58.50 in)
Weight (Empty): 315.26 lb (143.00 kg)

Caliber: 88mm (8.8cm)
Action: Ignition System
Feed: Single-Shot; Reusable
Muzzle Velocity: 460 ft/sec (140 m/sec)
Range: 1,150 ft (351 m; 383 yds)
Sights: Iron

Variants:
8.8cm Raketenwerfer 43 ("Puupchen") - Base Series Designation.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

88 Flak Gun / Anti Tank Gun

German experiences with Soviet heavy tanks have resulted in the production of some very powerful guns. Among these is the Model 1943 88-mm gun. This improved 88 has a very high muzzle velocity, which enables gunners to lay on and hit even distant moving targets with considerable ease. In fact, the trajectory followed by the projectile is so flat that, with certain sights, the gunner can make his own elevation calculations up to a range of 3,700 yards for high-explosive projectiles and 4,400 yards for armor-piercing projectiles. A trajectory as flat as this naturally means that gunners can open fire on tanks and other armored vehicles without preliminary registration. The rise of the shell in its flight seldom will be greater than the height of a tank. 


  

Besides being used as a direct-laid gun, the variations of the Model 1943 can also fire either time-fuzed or percussion 20.68-pound, high-explosive shells as far as 16,570 yards.
The verified armor-penetration capabilities of the Model 43 88's are remarkable. With the newer type of 22.4-pound capped armor-piercing shell (with ballistic cap to provide streamlining), the following can be achieved:



Range                 Penetration        

(shell hitting at right angles to the armor)
1,000 yards

7.87 inches
2,000 yards

6.61 inches
2,500 yards

6.02 inches



The Model 43 88's have certain drawbacks, however. While raising the muzzle velocity, the Germans have tried to keep down the weight of the gun. The result is a light tube with a considerably reduced safety factor. Therefore, German gun crews have been warned not to use high-velocity ammunition in Model 1943 tubes which have fired as many as 500 rounds. To preserve the gun tube against erosion, they may fire high-explosive shell with a low-velocity propellant rated at 1,080 feet per second. This ammunition gives a maximum range of only 7,765 yards. 

Thus far the Model 43 88's have appeared in the new Royal Tiger tank; in the "Elephant" (formerly called the "Ferdinand"), the "Rhinoceros" (formerly called the "Hornet"), and Panzerjäger Panther tank destroyers; and on two towed carriages (the Pak 43 and the Pak 43/41). Of these, the heavily-armored "Elephant" chassis has been found to be too cumbersome and mechanically unreliable. The "Rhinoceros" chassis is too slow; its armor is open on top, and provides protection only against shell splinters and caliber .30 bullets. The Pak 43/41 ground mount also appears to be unsatisfactory. Its conventional split-trail artillery carriage must be so heavy (9,660 pounds) that the complete piece weighs almost as much as the 12,300-pound 150-mm medium gun-howitzer s.F.H. 18. Such a weight precludes manhandling, and is a great handicap in getting the gun trained on a target which appears from an angle not covered by the carriage's 60-degree traverse.






Thursday, October 2, 2014

What makes Erwin Rommel a military 'great'?



Rommel is well respected for his tactical skill on the battlefield. Given open terrain and the ability to manuver, Rommel was a highly successful commander who was able to outmanuver or overcome the strengths of his enemies in specific instances. Much of this was also shaped by his willingness to put himself in the front lines.
In the Battle of France, his columns were attacked by British tanks near the town Arras. The heavily armored British Matildas were too well protected for the standard German anti-tank guns of the time. To break the British attack, Rommel established a gun line of 88mm Flak batteries which could take out the Matildas. In addition, his division moved with such speed and seemed to come out of nowhere in the battle seemed would earn the division the nickname "Ghost Division," though I cannot be sure who came up with the nickname. Some sources I have would give the origin to Germans because they couldn't get in contact with Rommel and didn't know where he was, and some other sources would say the French/British because he seemed to arrive where he was unexpected to arrive from.

His best campaign was in Africa, where he with a largely Italian force would drive the British from Benghazi, Libya to El Alamien Egypt. Here, with his skills in manuver was able to outflank and inflict heavy casualties on an enemy force that outnumbered him greatly and generally had more high quality troops available to them than were available to Rommel. In Tunisia, he would also rout American units in the Battle of Kasserine Pass and achieved such a victory that he could have broken Eisenhower's entire army in one fell swoop and prolong the African campaign by months.

Following Africa, Rommel was in relative obscuraty in Northern Italy and was partially responsible for disarming the Italian military after the surrender to the Allies in 1943. He would soon find himself back in France, this time to put forth the defense of the Atlantic Wall. Here, Rommel found himself increasingly at odds with other generals under his command and above him in the chain of command (some of this also occured in Africa, but not to the same degree as it was here). Rommel took the position that it would be best that Germany's tanks be placed close to the beaches so that they could hit the Allies while they were disorganized and getting off the landing craft. For, if they were allowed a toehold, the Western Allies' strengths of air power and logistics would easily defeat the Germans. However, his commander here, Gerd von Rundstedt was largely comming from the Eastern Front where Germany managed to maintain some semblence of air power and manuver up until 1943. Rundstedt argued that Germany's tanks would be better served in the interior to counter attack any possible penetration by the Allies. Hitler ultimately agreed with Rundstedt, and Rommel was left to improvise. His solution was to request mines by the millions, which the Reich couldn't provide him... and ultimately when the Allies did land in Normandy, Rundstedt's earlier victories and the Reich's inability to supply him proved Rommel's predictions right. The Allies gained a toehold and then used superior logistics and air power to outlast the Germans in Normandy. In this sense, Rommel accurately predicted how the Allies would win.

As such, Rommel's skills as a tactician were among the best in World War II. This is also not taking into account his career as a junior officer in WWI, which also included some heroic efforts. These efforts won him respect for his skills alone.

However, the respect and "honor" that has been given him doesn't come from his skills alone. His legacy, has largely been built on the fact that Rommel was not member of the Nazi Party and that there have been plenty of incidents that would create the image of an "honorable man" serving a dishonorable system. Rommel would disobey direct orders with regard to Hitler's favorite "no retreat" command. After El Alamien had gone so bad for him, Hitler gave the command as he always did, but Rommel ordered the retreat anyway to try and save the lives of his men. This action would actually set up the Battle of Kasserine Pass due to Rommel's assessment of Montgomery's caution and that it would prevent Monty from rushing to keep pressure on Rommel.

At other times in the African campaign, Hitler had issued orders that demanded the immediate execution of any commandos or Jews taken in Allied uniform. Most sources I've seen say that Rommel deliberately disobeyed these orders.

The biggest evidence of this comes from repeated incidents of criticizing the Fuhrer. Towards the end of the African campaign or while he was in Northern Italy, Rommel is famously quoted as saying that Hitler was living in some sort of "cuckoo land." The clinching factor in this argument comes from supposed connections between Rommel and the Valkyrie plot by Stauffenberg to kill Hitler. Rommel had no knowledge of the plot and wasn't actually a member of the plot, but two men that were implicated Rommel. One of them was also a member of Rommel's staff and had made the implication after being tortured by the SS. Hitler then gave Rommel a choice. He had the option of standing trial, for which he would certainly be found guilty, and his wife and son would also be executed for treason, or he could commit suicide via poison, and Rommel's family would be spared. Rommel took the poison to save his wife and son, which has created the image of an honorable man. The reason for Rommel's death that the Nazi's gave was ultimately that he had succumbed to wounds sustained in an allied air attack on his car on July 17, 1944.

These incidents created the image of an honorable warrior that fought not for Hitler but for Germany.

However, it would also bear to mind various criticisms of Rommel...

While Rommel was a great tactician, he probably was not that great a strategist. He was expressly ordered by Kesselring and by some Italian superiors not to cross into Egypt following the capture of Tobruk. Rommel ignored these orders and advanced into Egypt where he was soon facing a situation at El Alamien where his tactics of going around the flank wouldn't work. In that sense, Rommel set up his own defeat at El Alamein.

In addition, Rommel also mistakenly believed that the main Allied landings on D-Day would be at the Pas Du Calias, because the region would provide the best spot for Allied air cover. This largely left progress in the Normandy sector lacking and would help enable the Allies to win there. Rommel would be quick to realize that Normandy was the real landing zone, but the fact that he guessed wrong can not be denied. In fact, Rommel was not even at his HQ when the Allies attacked. He had gone back to Germany for either his wedding anniversery or his wife's birthday.

In addition, close examination of his political stances, while he wasn't pro-Nazi, he wasn't exactly anti-Nazi either. He has been described as apolitical, which I would agree with, but by being so, it could also mean that while he didn't agree with the Nazis, it was clear that he wasn't going to take a direct stand against them. The fact that he was not part of the Stauffenberg plot is clear of this aspect as well.

However, these things have not totally tarnished Rommel's record or removed his tactical skills.

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Panzer General Online



 
Ready your army for battle and step into the open-beta world of Panzer General Online. The free-to-play browser-based title is now open to all players, so now’s the perfect time to become an armchair general. Take on historically inspired battles in an experience that combines collectible card games with old-school board games. Check out the open beta trailer to see the game in action.


Those of you who took part in the closed beta will get exclusive access to two new tanks – one for the German army and one for the US army – as thanks for your support. The closed beta was a great learning experience for the team at Blue Byte. They were able to listen to the fans and make improvements based on your suggestions. For example, Skirmish 2.0 has been added to the game to enhance multiplayer. Go into battle on equal footing when you square off against another player with pre-constructed decks. No one has the distinct advantage and everyone must rely on their wits.

Excellence versus numbers - Tiger I


When comparing the small number of Tigers produced (only 1347) to the more than 120,000 T-34s and Shermans combined, one can appreciate the psychological impact of this model, at least from the Allied tank crew perspective. In its concept laid the very core of the German conception of a heavy tank. Something which targeted absolute excellence in design, combining lethality with the best possible protection, only given to elite crews, all this regardless of the cost. Excellent engineering and training versus numbers underlined all this philosophy and was reflected later in small tactical unit operations.

The Tiger was a formidable machine that pushed the boundaries of armored warfare and forced the Allies to devise better tanks. It powerfully symbolized all the might of the Nazi war machine as dreamt off by Hitler, and later turned through propaganda into a "Wunderwaffe" (wonder weapon) in a mostly defensive war. However, behind the curtain, the Tiger clearly sacrificed mobility and ease of maintenance, but it was always deadly effective (with a 10:1 up to 19:1 kill ratio), earning a capital of fear that was unrivaled during the war. Allied crews found themselves hopeless with their inadequate machines, having to improvise costly tactics to deal with it. The Tiger gave fame to a few WWII tank aces, like Michael Wittman, something unheard of since the life expectancy of a tank crew was always quite shorter than that of fighter pilots.

A long development history, started in 1935


The search for a suitable engine

The first mention of a 30-ton class Panzer could be found in the note written by General Liese, head of the Heeres Waffenamt, on 30 October 1935. This was the result of the weight estimation for a tank equipped with a high velocity 75 mm (2.95 in), powerful enough to destroy French tanks Char 2C, 3C and D, and a minimum 30 mm (1.18 in) of armor. The representative of the Wa Pruef 6 in charge of the project met Dr. Maybach in October to discuss the feasibility of a 600/700 hp engine. Maybach dismissed a 16-cylinder as too long to fit in an engine compartment, so only a scaled-up 12-cylinder could be conceived, although it required a tremendous amount of development to reach the targeted output of 600 hp. Later discussions led to the conclusion that only a 16-cylinder could provide the 700 hp needed for a 30-40 tons tank. This was still optimistic given the fact that in 1936 Maybach was still struggling to produce its first compact 300 hp engine. Wa Pruef 6 also studied the use of an aircraft engine, characterized by high-torque and low rpm, but this posed the obligation of redesigning many components of the drive train, which would mean sacrificing other vital aspects to stay within the 30 tons limit.

Preliminary prototypes ordered by Wa Pruef 6

In January 1937, Baurat Kniepkamp from Wa pruef 6, the department which laid the specifications and contacted the contractors, ordered a chassis (Fahrgestell) from Henschel, and the turret by Krupp, already contacted to study a 30-ton tank turret housing a 75 mm (2.95 in) in November 1936. The first designation was BW (verstaerkt), for Begleitswagen (escort tank, heavier), to differentiate this model from the Panzer IV already called "BW". In March 1937 this was changed for IW for "Infanteriewagen", then DW ("Durchbruchswagen" or breakthrough tank), and in November 1939, VK 30.01 alte konstruktion (DW).

The Durchbruchswagen DW-1 and DW-2

According to the delivery plan from the 1st of October 1937, Henschel had to provide a DW fahrgestell prototype with Cleveland track system gear ("Clectracgetriebe"), and one with differential drive ("Uberlagerungsgestriebe"), in the second half of 1938, for trials. They were both renamed by Henschel to DW-1 and DW-2 Erprobungst-Fahgestell (experimental chassis). The DW-1 was made of soft steel with plate thickness of 50 mm (1.97 in) on the front, side and rear, and 20 mm (0.79 in) elsewhere. It was propelled by a Maybach 120 TR, varlorex transmission and cletract system of three-stage steering gears allowing 35 km/h (22 mph). There were also six double road wheels per side suspended by torsion arms on center guide track with a 300 mm (11.8 in) pitch. The DW-2 was similar but with automotive improvements made to the steering gear, final drive, parking brakes, torsion bars, having the tracks decreased to a 260 mm (10.2 in) pitch and changed drive sprockets. Both weighed 30 metric tons capable of 35 km/h (22 mph).

On the side of Krupp, a conceptual preliminary design for a turret (AF30304) was sent on 22 February 1937. Dr. Olbricht from Wa Pruef 6 informed Krupp of various points for the definitive design in March 1937, notably the 1500 mm (4.92 ft) turret ring, 50 mm (1.96 in) thick turret walls, plus 20 mm (0.79 in) mantlet, new ball bearing, and adapted elevating mechanism, but no electric traverse. A direct prototype had to be produced, bypassing a wooden mockup stage. Finally, on 24 June 1938, Wa Pruef 6 awarded Krupp a contract for a trial turret. In April 1939 modifications were requested and a schedule required the completion of the turret until May, 26, 1939, which then had to be shipped to Magdeburg to be compared to that of a Panzer IV.

The VK 30.01

Alongside the WB initial tests in September 1938, the Heeres Waffenamt authorized the development of a 30-ton tank prototype called VK 30.01. This was discussed with Wa Pruef 6 in January 1939, with specifications including a 75 mm (2.95 in) KwK L/24 gun (short barrel), the same crew as the Panzer IV and 50 mm (1.97 in) of armor. Henschel devised a new chassis for this purpose, with all the lessons retained from the DWs. A new Maybach HL 116 engine, new drivetrain and, most important, seven pairs of interleaved wheels (Geschachelte) to distribute the 32 tons of the tank and to reduce the ground pressure. At the same time Krupp was awarded the construction of an armored test hull, to be delivered at Kummersdorf on 23 April 1940. The new construction involved dropping the vertical joint assembly, for new PP792 armor plates. However this hull was not delivered until September 1940, and tests involved only 37 mm (1.46 in) guns.

Meanwhile, Maybach made available the new HL 190 and HL 150 (400 hp) and well as new transmissions. Krupp redesigned a turret to match the VK 65.01 for better commonality, having a low profile as the gun centerline was to be 335 mm (13.2 in) over the deck. Externally, it had many features identical to the Panzer IV türm. As requested, there was also a small oval hole for a rearward machine-gun, with an armored semi-disc which pivoted to close this weak point. A turret observation periscope was also to be provided.

By November, 19, 1939 it was agreed that Henschel would deliver three prototypes of the neu konstruktion armored chassis from March to April 1940. In July 1940, Krupp was ordered to deliver a complete turret with the PP 739 armor plate and later eight armored hulls for Henschel, the last scheduled in October 1941, but in reality delivered on 30 November. On 25 September 1942, Oberstleutnant Krekel from the Wa Pruef 6 ordered from Henschel four new updated chassis to be used for training drivers. Already by November 1941 there were concerns about upgrading the main gun (following the encounter of the first KV-1s) to the long-barrel L/34, then later L/43. Krupp objected that this would have triggered further delays. Eventually this prospect was dropped on January, 30, 1942. The eight VK 30.01 turrets would eventually be placed on the Atlantic wall from May to September 1944.

The VK 36.01

This short-lived projected was born in June 1939, when it was asked to Krupp to develop a 105 mm (4.13 in) armed turret. The turret walls had to be 100 mm (3.94 in) thick and the gun was a standard howitzer L/20 or L/28, all of which to be packed on a standard BW hull, with a top weight of no more than 30 tons. It was then designated AW (Artilleriewagen). By mid-1940 Henschel was ordered to modify the BW Fahrgestell to mount the new Krupp 105 turret. At the same time it was revised internally to accept the new Maybach HL 174 giving a 450 hp max output. The hull front had to be 80 mm (3.15 in) thick and the total weight was uplifted to 36 tons, sitting on interleaved wheels.

Eventually on the 26th May of 1942, Hitler intervened to specify that the new heavy tank should have the frontal armor 100 mm (3.94 in) thick, and 60 mm (2.36 in) sides, and ordered six prototypes from Porsche and Henschel. Following this, Wa Pruef 6 remade the specifications. The turret now needed to accept the 75 mm (2.95 in) Waffe 725 (without muzzle brake) and on 11 June 1942 notified Krupp to drop the 105 mm (4.13 in) project and convert the turret according to the new specifications. By August, this was renamed "Tigersprogramm". Eventually, the sole VK 36.01 chassis was delivered in March 1942 for tests, after being equipped at Maybach factory near Friedschafen. The original six turrets ordered to Krupp were turned in the meantime into turmstellungen (fixed turrets), but completion of the modifications required were never carried out.

The Porsche Tiger

Porsche was asked to study the feasibility of heavy and even super-heavy tanks from 1941 and tried to respond in a innovative manner to the challenge posed by the ultra-sturdy transmission needed for the task of transferring such loads. The most original feature of its designs were electric motors powered by connected gasoline engines and external suspension torsion bars to save internal space.

The Porsche Type 100

Porsche's first prototype for a heavy tank was launched in late 1939. The Typ 100 was -with Wa Pruef 6 support- the fruit of the collaboration of Krupp (armored hull), Steyr (air-cooled engines) and Siemens (electrical components). Nibelungenwerke performed the final assembly. The drivetrain was powered by twin ten-cylinder engines each connected to an electrical generator. These animated two electrical motors in the front, activating the drive sprockets. There were three sets of roadwheels mated on a single external longitudinally-mounted torsion bar. The tracks were supported by two double return rollers on each side. Porsche was awarded three armored hulls, and a soft-steel one, which was only completed in July 1941. As early as March 1941 Krupp engaged itself to deliver six turrets equipped with the new 8.8 cm (3.46 in) KwK L/56. The unique Typ 100 chassis undergone thorough testings at Nibelungenwerke, and the program then known as Leopard changed its name into the Tiger.

The VK 45.01 (P)

The tank had to be larger and Porsche made a series of modifications to the Typ 100, with new engines, relocated drive sprockets to the rear, increased frontal armor to 100 mm (3.94 in), new engine compartment and more fuel storage, 60 cm (23.6 in) wide tracks and metal-rimmed road wheels. The return rollers were dropped. The Porsche heavy tank new prototype was then reinstated VK 45.01 (P) according to the turret specified by Wa Pruef 6. In July 1941, Krupp was ordered to deliver a hundred hulls derived from the new prototype and the same number of turret to be assembled at Nibelungenwerke. In turn, the company was ordered to deliver ten complete pre-serie vehicles for tests by May 1942. But the completion was later rushed to match Hiltler's birthday in April. However serious supply problems with automotive parts delayed the completion of the first in July 1942, then the nine others will follow in small batches until October, when the official objective was the completion of 76 Tiger(P).

These delays were cut short by Hitler's decision to terminate the program, as the remaining 90 vehicles would be turned into Panzerjägers with the new 88 mm (3.46 in) L/72 gun. Later these were known as the Sd.Kfz. 182 Ferdinand/Elefant. The ten first VK 45.01 would see service with the test unit Schwere Panzer Abteilung Abt 503, and were known in short as the Tiger (P). Only one seems to have been used in action, the modified Panzer Befehlwagen (with a new set of long-range radios) in Ukraine with the Abteilung 653 from April to July 1944. Three other hulls were completed as BergePanzer Tiger(P), and three others as Rammtiger. Eventually four of these hull will receive definitive turrets by Krupp and were kept for tests in August 1943.